The Best Workato Alternatives in 2026 for Scalable Business Integrations

Published: Oct 15, 2024 | Last updated: Jan 31, 2026

Table of Contents

Quick Comparison Table

ToolBest ForBidirectional SyncPricing ModelAI Features
ExalateIntra & Cross-company integrations with full scripting control for advanced use casesYes, real-timeOutcome-based (active items in sync)Aida AI for scripting and troubleshooting
Tray.aiInternal workflow automation with AI agentsLimitedTask-based, starts ~$695/moMerlin Agent Builder
BoomiHybrid cloud data managementYesCustom enterprise pricingAI-powered mapping
MuleSoftSalesforce-centric enterprisesYesCustom enterprise pricingAI copilots
SnapLogicLow-code enterprise integrationLimitedCustom pricingSnapGPT AI
ZapierSimple, no-code automationsNo (one-way triggers)Per-task, starts $19.99/moAI workflow builder
JitterbitLow-code app developmentLimitedEnterprise pricing (~$1,000+/mo)AI-assisted mapping
InformaticaLarge-scale data orchestrationYesCustom enterprise pricingCLAIRE AI engine
CeligoMid-market e-commerce integrationLimitedCustom pricingCeligo AI
ONEiOFully managed integrationsLimitedCustom pricingLimited
Microsoft Power AutomateMicrosoft 365 ecosystemLimitedPer-user or per-flowCopilot AI

What is Workato?

Workato is an enterprise integration platform that connects applications, databases, workflows, and cloud services. Beyond basic integrations, Workato offers API management, bot management through its Workbot feature, and a data hub for master data management.

In 2025, Workato launched its Workato ONE platform with agentic orchestration capabilities, including Workato Genies (AI agents), Agent Studio for building custom agents, and Enterprise MCP (Model Context Protocol) for connecting AI agents to enterprise systems.

Workato Features

Workato offers the following capabilities:

Pre-built connectors for 1,000+ applications, a low-code recipe builder, event triggers and automation logic, Workbot for Slack and Teams, B2B/EDI capabilities, enterprise iPaaS functionality, data orchestration and Data Hub/MDM, Workato Genies and Agent Studio for AI agents, Intelligent Document Processing (IDP), and Decision Models for workflow decisioning.

Workato serves organizations like Cisco, Nokia, and Monday.com, positioning itself as an enterprise-grade automation platform.

Workato Limitations

Despite its capabilities, Workato has documented limitations worth considering:

Complex pricing structure. Workato uses a usage-based pricing model that can be difficult to predict. Annual costs typically range from $15,000 to $50,000 for mid-market companies, with enterprise deployments reaching $100,000 or more. The task-based billing model means costs can escalate quickly with high-volume workflows.

Steep learning curve. While marketed as low-code, complex integrations often require significant technical expertise. The recipe builder can become cumbersome for sophisticated data transformations.

Limited customization depth. Although Workato offers many pre-built connectors, customizing sync logic for specific use cases often requires working with their universal connector, which adds implementation overhead.

Cloud-only deployment. Workato operates entirely in the cloud, which may not suit organizations with strict data residency requirements or on-premise systems.

What to Consider When Choosing Workato Alternatives

Before evaluating alternatives, clarify your integration requirements:

Integration complexity. Do you need simple one-way data pushes, or complex bidirectional synchronization with custom transformation logic?

Cross-company vs. internal. Are you connecting systems within your organization, or do you need to integrate with external partners, suppliers, or MSPs?

Technical resources. Does your team have developers who can write custom scripts, or do you need a purely no-code solution?

Pricing predictability. Task-based pricing can create budget uncertainty. Consider whether outcome-based or flat-rate pricing better fits your planning needs.

Scalability requirements. Will your integration volume grow significantly? Evaluate how pricing scales with usage.

Security and compliance. What are your data residency, encryption, and audit requirements?

Support and documentation. How critical is vendor support for your implementation success?

The Best Workato Alternatives

Tray.ai

Tray.ai is an AI-powered integration platform that provides workflow automation through its Universal Automation Cloud.

Key Features: Connector Hub with 600+ integrations, Merlin Agent Builder for AI agents, Agent Gateway for MCP governance, drag-and-drop workflow builder, and enterprise core with SOC 2 and GDPR compliance.

Pros: Large connector library, AI-assisted workflow creation through Merlin, user-friendly interface for internal automation, and strong governance features.

Cons: Error handling can be complex to navigate, pre-built connectors offer limited customization, no testing environment before deployment, and pricing scales with task volume.

Pricing: Plans start around $695/month for Standard, scaling to enterprise pricing. Median annual spend is approximately $38,000 based on market data.

Best for: Internal workflow automation teams who need AI agent capabilities within a governed environment.

Not for: Organizations requiring deep bidirectional sync with external partners or granular scripting control.

Exalate

Exalate is a bidirectional synchronization platform designed for complex, intra and cross-company integration scenarios where precision and control matter.

Key Features: Groovy-based scripting engine for granular customization, Aida AI for script generation and troubleshooting, unified console to manage all integrations from a single interface, Test Run functionality to validate sync configurations before deployment, script versioning with rollback capabilities, real-time sync with full issue history, and platform-native event triggers.

Exalate supports integrations with Jira Cloud, ServiceNow, Salesforce, Azure DevOps (Cloud and Server), Zendesk, GitHub, Freshdesk, Freshservice, and Asana. Custom connectors can be developed for specific ITSM systems, legacy tools, or other platforms.

Pros: Deep customization through scripting allows virtually any sync logic. AI-assisted configuration through Aida reduces the learning curve for Groovy scripting. The unified management console eliminates the need to switch between multiple interfaces. Test Run lets you validate configurations without affecting production data. Pricing is based on active items in sync rather than arbitrary user counts or task volumes.

Cons: Supports fewer applications than broad iPaaS platforms, though the scripting engine enables deep integrations with supported systems. Basic Groovy knowledge helps with advanced configurations, though Aida can generate scripts from natural language descriptions.

Pricing: Outcome-based pricing starts at $100/month per integration. Pro and Enterprise plans offer custom volumes and additional features. See the pricing model or use the pricing calculator for specific use cases.

Security: ISO 27001 certified, encryption for data in transit and at rest, role-based access control, and flexible authentication (API keys, OAuth, PAT). Visit the Trust Center for detailed security documentation.

Best for: Organizations needing bidirectional sync between systems with different workflows, MSPs collaborating with clients, enterprises requiring full control over data transformation logic, and teams that need to test integrations before production deployment.

Not for: Teams seeking simple, one-way automation without customization needs.

Start a free Exalate trial

Boomi

Boomi is an iPaaS solution supporting integration of internal and external workflows across cloud and on-premise environments.

Key Features: API management, B2B/EDI management, Master Data Hub, Event Streams, intelligent integration mapping, over 200,000 connector variations, and deployment flexibility across private and public clouds.

Pros: Strong community support, extensive templated integrations, hybrid deployment options, good for consolidating data from multiple sources.

Cons: Can struggle with multiple concurrent connectors, API management functionality is basic compared to dedicated solutions, pricing structure favors larger enterprises, and error reporting lacks detail.

Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing. Contact Boomi for quotes.

Best for: Mid-to-large enterprises needing hybrid cloud integration with master data management capabilities.

Not for: Small teams or those needing lightweight, affordable integration solutions.

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform

MuleSoft, owned by Salesforce, provides enterprise integration, API management, and workflow automation capabilities.

Key Features: Pre-built connectors, custom integration development, Anypoint CLI, API Governance, Flex Gateway, Studio IDE, API Designer, Partner Manager, Code Builder, MuleSoft RPA, and Intelligent Document Processing.

Pros: Native Salesforce integration, highly adaptable to complex use cases, centralized API and integration management, large template library, strong enterprise governance.

Cons: Requires a deep understanding of Salesforce architecture, contains features many organizations never use, pricing is enterprise-focused, and can be substantial.

Pricing: Custom enterprise pricing. Typically requires significant investment.

Best for: Salesforce-centric enterprises with dedicated integration teams and a budget for enterprise tooling.

Not for: Organizations without Salesforce or those seeking a quick, lightweight integration setup.

SnapLogic

SnapLogic offers a low-code integration platform for enterprise workflows and data pipelines.

Key Features: SnapLogic AutoSync, GenAI Builder, API Management, AutoSuggest, AutoPrep, 700+ pre-built Snaps (connectors), ELT/ETL capabilities, SnapGPT for AI-assisted integration building.

Pros: Extensive pre-built connector library, AI capabilities through SnapGPT improve connection quality, suitable for data integration scenarios.

Cons: Interface can lag and crash under load, error handling mechanisms are complex, enterprise pricing model.

Pricing: Custom pricing based on requirements.

Best for: Enterprises focused on data integration and ETL/ELT workflows who want AI assistance in building pipelines.

Not for: Teams needing primarily application-to-application workflow automation.

Zapier

Zapier provides drag-and-drop automation between applications with over 7,000 app connectors.

Key Features: Zaps (automated workflows), Tables, Interfaces (custom pages), Canvas (AI-powered workflow mapping), Chatbots, extensive app library.

Pros: Accessible to non-technical users, event-based automation, the broadest connector library in the market, and affordable entry-level pricing.

Cons: Advanced features require premium tiers, do not support ongoing bidirectional synchronization, Zaps can fail during critical integration scenarios, limited for complex enterprise use cases.

Pricing: Free tier available. Team plans start at $19.99/month. Enterprise pricing available.

Best for: Small teams and individuals needing simple, one-way automation between popular apps without technical overhead.

Not for: Organizations requiring bidirectional sync, complex data transformation, or enterprise governance.

Jitterbit Harmony

Jitterbit provides low-code integration and application development capabilities.

Key Features: iPaaS functionality, EDI capabilities, API Manager, App Builder, Salesforce Data Loader, 400+ integration templates, ETL support.

Pros: Extract, Transform, Load capabilities, API building and customization, intuitive interface for basic use cases.

Cons: Steep learning curve for advanced features, lacks version control and event logging, enterprise pricing (estimated starting at $1,000/month).

Pricing: Enterprise pricing. Contact for quotes.

Best for: Business users needing low-code integration with application development capabilities.

Not for: Teams requiring detailed audit trails or version control for compliance.

Informatica

Informatica offers enterprise data management with AI-powered integration and governance capabilities.

Key Features: Data Catalog, Data Integration and Engineering, Data Marketplace, API and App Integration, Data Quality and Observability, MDM and 360 Applications, Governance, Access and Privacy, CLAIRE AI Engine.

Pros: Applicable across multiple industries, deep data integration capabilities, complex information lookup and transformation, user-friendly interface.

Cons: Data quality management requires manual configuration, a complex pricing model, and GUI-only mapping generation.

Pricing: Enterprise pricing based on deployment requirements.

Best for: Large enterprises with complex data governance and quality requirements across multiple platforms.

Not for: Teams seeking straightforward application integration without data management complexity.

Celigo

Celigo combines drag-and-drop functionality with scripting capabilities for e-commerce and business application integration.

Key Features: Celigo AI, API Management, Error Management, B2B Manager, extensive connector template library.

Pros: Large template library, clear integration backlogs, dedicated error management feature, good for e-commerce workflows.

Cons: Fewer enterprise features compared to full iPaaS platforms, limited product breadth.

Pricing: Custom pricing based on requirements.

Best for: Mid-market e-commerce companies needing NetSuite, Shopify, or similar integrations with an error handling focus.

Not for: Enterprises requiring broad cross-platform orchestration.

ONEiO

ONEiO provides fully managed integration services through a centralized interface.

Key Features: 10,000+ application support by default, no-code editor, attachment handling, data anonymization, and transformation.

Pros: Large connector library, no-code connection building, managed service reduces operational burden.

Cons: No on-premise deployment option, lacks API management capabilities, smaller partner network compared to major iPaaS vendors.

Pricing: Custom pricing for managed integration services.

Best for: Organizations wanting fully managed integration without internal operational overhead.

Not for: Teams requiring on-premise deployment or API management capabilities.

Microsoft Power Automate

Power Automate offers robotic process automation within the Microsoft ecosystem.

Key Features: Cloud flows, desktop flows (RPA), AI Builder, process mining, integration with Microsoft 365, Teams, SharePoint, and Dynamics 365, Copilot AI assistance.

Pros: Native Microsoft 365 integration, included in many Microsoft licenses, AI assistance through Copilot, strong for desktop automation scenarios.

Cons: Most powerful when used within the Microsoft ecosystem, limited for cross-platform enterprise scenarios, and licensing can become complex.

Pricing: Per-user plans start around $15/user/month. Per-flow plans are available for process-specific pricing.

Best for: Organizations heavily invested in Microsoft 365 needing workflow automation across Microsoft applications.

Not for: Teams requiring deep integration with non-Microsoft enterprise systems.

Why Exalate Stands Out As A Workato Alternative

For organizations needing to synchronize data bidirectionally with internal teams, external partners, suppliers, or clients, Exalate addresses specific challenges that general-purpose iPaaS platforms don’t solve well:

Full scripting control. Unlike template-based tools that limit customization, Exalate’s Groovy scripting engine handles any data transformation logic. If you can write it, Exalate can sync it.

AI-assisted configuration. Aida helps generate scripts from natural language descriptions, explains errors in plain language, and provides context-aware resolution suggestions. This reduces the barrier to entry for teams without deep Groovy experience.

Unified management. Manage all integrations from a single console with network visualization showing how systems connect. This eliminates context-switching between multiple platforms.

Safe testing. Test Run lets you validate sync configurations against real data without creating entities on the destination side. This reduces the risk of errors affecting production systems.

Predictable pricing. Pay based on active items currently in sync, not cumulative transactions or arbitrary user counts. This makes costs predictable and aligned with actual business value.

Security and compliance. ISO 27001 certification, encryption at rest and in transit, role-based access control, and flexible authentication options. Integration management access is decoupled from ticketing system credentials. Visit the Trust Center for detailed documentation.

Support resources. Access documentation at docs.exalate.com, community forums for peer support, and direct support channels for implementation assistance.

MSPs use Exalate to improve collaboration with clients through bidirectional sync without exposing internal systems. Development and support teams use it to bridge Jira with ServiceNow, Zendesk, or Salesforce while maintaining independent workflows on each side.

To evaluate how Exalate fits your use case, book a demo with the engineering team.

Start a free Exalate trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best alternative to Workato?

Zapier offers automations between many platforms, though it’s limited in functionality and doesn’t support bidirectional sync. Open-source tools like n8n and Activepieces provide self-hosted options but require technical resources to maintain.

For organizations needing robust bidirectional synchronization, Exalate is a strong alternative with a 30-day free trial. It offers full scripting control, AI-assisted configuration through Aida, and outcome-based pricing that’s often more affordable than Workato’s task-based model for ongoing use. Unlike simple automation tools, Exalate handles complex intra and cross-company integrations with custom data transformation logic.

If budget is the primary concern, evaluate whether simpler tools can actually meet your requirements. Many teams discover that limitations in free or low-cost tools create operational overhead that exceeds the cost of a purpose-built solution.

How does Workato pricing compare to alternatives?

Workato uses usage-based pricing, typically ranging from $15,000 to $50,000 annually for mid-market deployments. Enterprise costs can exceed $100,000. Alternatives vary significantly: Zapier starts at $19.99/month for simple automations, while enterprise iPaaS platforms like MuleSoft and Informatica require custom quotes. Exalate offers outcome-based pricing starting at $100/month per integration, charging based on active items in sync rather than task volume.

Can Workato alternatives handle bidirectional synchronization?

Most iPaaS platforms focus on one-way triggers and actions. True bidirectional sync with conflict resolution and custom transformation logic requires specialized tools. Exalate, Boomi, and MuleSoft offer bidirectional capabilities, though implementation complexity varies. Zapier and similar automation tools are primarily designed for one-way workflows.

Which Workato alternative is best for Jira integrations?

For Jira-specific integrations, consider the destination system. Exalate specializes in Jira integrations with ServiceNow, Salesforce, Azure DevOps, Zendesk, and other platforms, offering deep field mapping and bidirectional sync. For simple Jira-to-app automation, Zapier or Tray.ai may suffice. For Jira-to-Jira synchronization across instances, Exalate provides dedicated functionality.

Recommended Reads

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join +5.000 companies and get monthly integration content straight into your inbox

Shopping Basket