
So you alredy know integration between tools is essential for your business.
Now, you might be asking yourself: should we build and maintain an integration in-house, or spend a few hours deploying it with an external tool?
Development looks cheaper upfront. But then...
Your integration breaks every time an API updates
The dev who built it left. And the documentation of the project is not up-to-date.
A "quick fix" requests now take weeks to get done
You need to integrate more systems... and repeat everything

Exalate gives you the flexibility of a custom integration solution — without the maintenance nightmare

AI Assist generates sync scripts from your prompts. What took 20 hours of manual coding now takes 2.

Have complete control of your own integration settings, even when working with external partners.

Connect 2 systems or 10. Add new partners with a few clicks. No architectural limits.


You're not alone in considering custom development. Here's what happened when these teams ran the numbers.

NVISO's team successfully built their own integration. It functioned exactly as intended. The code worked. Data synced properly.But then, reality hit: maintenance costs were too high.
EBU's team was already stretched thin. Building an integration from scratch would pull developers away from core product work.They recognized that with the advent of AI and other technologies, their in-house integration would soon become obsolete
Tickets manually copied across tools
Updates that don't sync automatically
Important data living in 3 places, all different
See the true cost of building integrations in-house
Sources: Stack Overflow Developer Survey 2024, Gartner Integration Research, IEEE Software Engineering Reports




